consider several facts:
-two year olds, when their speech is recorded candidly, simply fail to to say Doug and duck enough times for us to know whether or not they know those words.
-i can estimate very specific factors about someone's childhood by the way he folds his towel.
-some people feel lonely.
-all people know how to explain.
i think that in order to know something, you have to take shortcuts and make rash assumptions. you should only check one time whether two things go together in order to learn that they always go together. you only have to look at something once in order to know its essence for all eternity. if two things do not go together, they will never go together. if you are especially interested in one thing, you can look more closely, but surely you will die before you manage to treat more than one or two things with fairness.
but as you see that looking closely clarifies one thing, you will reason that all things can only be clear by looking closely, and every part making up each of those things, in turn, must be inspected. you will begin to feel lonely.
some things, looking at them, you cause them to change, and you have vitiated whatever you sought to respect by learning about it. you will feel lonelier yet.
maybe inspecting is not the
right thing to do. better instead to know without inspecting, to know without knowing. only do what is customary. eventually the part of you that does not think will know how to manage things masterfully.
